Responsibility and Irresponsibility of Historical Studies
A Critical Consideration of the Ethic Dimension of the Historian’s Work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69791/rahc.285Keywords:
Historiography, historians, responsibility, ethics, values, scienceAbstract
Jörn Rüsen approaches the responsibility/irresponsibility dichotomy in this article as a constitutive element of historian’s work. From a triple-levelled perspective of responsibility item (reception, representation and projection of the past), proposes to historians an anthropologic- hermeneutical formulation in methodological terms in order to overcome the intersubjectivity frame established between past and present, with historians and its scientifically and citizen oriented features in the middle.
Downloads
Global Statistics ℹ️
|
27
Views
|
13
Downloads
|
|
40
Total
|
|
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2007 Jörn Rüsen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Alcores is an open-access journal. It provides unrestricted access to its content from the moment of publication. We respect intellectual property rights, and for this reason, the author retains the copyright. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. The terms of the license can be consulted at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This license allows sharing (copying and redistributing the material in any medium or format) and adapting (remixing, transforming, and building upon the material for any purpose), provided that authorship and first publication in this journal are properly credited, a link to the license is included, and any changes made are indicated.
This type of license facilitates the freedom of reuse and ensures that the content of this journal can be used to meet research needs.
